andygates: (Default)
andygates ([personal profile] andygates) wrote2008-12-09 12:17 pm
Entry tags:

Borgwatch: ITAP prosthetics

"Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis" - ITAP - is doing the rounds of the news media right now as Kira Mason (wot was blowed up in the London bombings) and her boffins wave their her new arm and their new technique at the world.  In a nutshell, it's a good, strong, non-rejecting non-infecting metal-to-bone-through-skin graft.  Part of it is nifty coatings on the titanium rod that's inserted into the bone where it passes through skin; the other part is the cunning antler-model fusion section, where a basket-shaped piece allows flesh and bone to grow through the implant, making everything fused tight, slightly giving, and biologically calm. 

It ought to do away with harnesses and cuffs, none of which are really very good.  It's more sensitive, more precise, and able to handle heavier loads.  Combined with some of the nifty arm tech coming out of Dean Kamen's skunkworks (a genius and some DARPA funding: two great tastes that taste great together), things are looking up. 
calum: (Default)

[personal profile] calum 2008-12-09 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
That looked really impressive on BBC breakfast this morning, but the presenters completely seemed to miss that the clever thing was how it was attached, not the arm on the end of it.

[identity profile] ravenbait.livejournal.com 2008-12-09 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
That is so much more awesome than the silly bint who wanted to implant a bluetooth camera in her prosthetic eye (not to mention the geeks falling over themselves to say it could be done without knowing how the damn things are made).

The attachment part can't be seen by the audience, silly boys. Why would anyone want to concentrate on that, no matter how innovative and cool it is?