andygates: (Default)
andygates ([personal profile] andygates) wrote2009-09-22 11:41 pm

Ignition Interlock

Riddle me this: A law is passing through California legislature requiring drunk-drivers to have ignition interlock devices fitted to their cars.  Ignition interlock is basically a breathalyzer that you have to pass before the ignition will work.  Sounds great to us squishies: drunks are left where they can't hurt and scare folks, and most of the time everyone in a group is drunk if the driver is so "Hey Fred, breathe into this" is a weak counter (and would attract bonus special sanctions).

Now, here's the thing: According to the article, ignition interlock appeared on the scene in 1987.  And the current law will only start a pilot in 2010 with California-wide coverage in 2016 assuming it isn't banjaxed by politics et al.

My question is this:  Why the hell aren't these mandatorily installed at the factory?  Why the hell haven't we got them over here? 
calum: (Default)

[personal profile] calum 2009-09-23 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, they dont work very well. They tend to produce false positives, leaving someone unable to drive. This has been used to challenge them in court.

I think a wider trial is a good plan, would let them iron out some of the bugs.. bring the price down, etc..

[identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com 2009-09-23 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe in combination with a Brain Training user interface? ;)