andygates: (Default)
andygates ([personal profile] andygates) wrote2007-03-14 08:08 pm
Entry tags:

This Trident thing...

Please explain to me just who we're going to nuke?

For extra credit, compare to insurance against badger attack: £1000 premium, and we promise to gas the one wot bit you.  Explain how Trident offers a substantially more well-priced policy against a more credible threat.

Please explain to me just why this is anything more than reluctance to leave the Big Swinging Dicks Club?

An armed society is a polite society

[identity profile] gedhrel.livejournal.com 2007-03-16 10:23 am (UTC)(link)
In states where carrying in a car is permitted, drivers who are armed are more likely to commit acts of road rage.

I'd offer a citation but I can't be arsed.

Re: An armed society is a polite society

[identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com 2007-03-16 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
It's credible without the citation. People are dumb / mendacious / impulsive. The more weapons, and the bigger the weapons, the greater the consequences of any dumbness, mendacity or impulse (viz the man-on-the-street's 9/12 "glass Mecca!" rants from the USA).

This risk is independent of any deterrent effect.

A weak deterrent and a high risk combine to make the possession of a deterrent more dangerous than not having it. Especially if you could have spent the billions on something more useful.