Entry tags:
300
Well, I've finally seen 300 and I think I agree with the detractors. The "you can't trust appeasers / support the troops" subplot was entirely added and even used lines the American political right have used, verbatim; the "Hooah!" Spartans were really silly; the clean-cut = good, simpering dark pierced weirdo = bad schtick was way overplayed; and I hated hated hated what they did to Xerxes, who's just your overweening god-king in the original but turned into some sort of pervy Stargate mutant freakoid. Oh, and they got rid of the whole Stelios/Stumblios thread and humoured-up the Spartans so they weren't such hard icy bastards, just to be sure we emoted. And they conveniently underplayed the baby-killing psycho part of the Spartans to overplay the "flower of democracy" - even while saying "we do what we were bred to do" with no irony.
The war rhino was crap too.
In good: The shield clash was perfect, some of the fights were a delight, the Spartans' magic leather pants of invulnerability were nice eye candy.
But mostly, the eye-candy left me cold. I like silly war porn, I like comic-book cheese, but this did leave me with that dirty, you've-had-your-strings-pulled-by-Leni-Reifenstahl feeling. I wanted to rave about it; I came out ranting instead.
Now Wash Your Eyes.
The war rhino was crap too.
In good: The shield clash was perfect, some of the fights were a delight, the Spartans' magic leather pants of invulnerability were nice eye candy.
But mostly, the eye-candy left me cold. I like silly war porn, I like comic-book cheese, but this did leave me with that dirty, you've-had-your-strings-pulled-by-Leni-Reifenstahl feeling. I wanted to rave about it; I came out ranting instead.

Now Wash Your Eyes.
no subject
Great description!
So, the pierced Persian didn't go over well with you, either, huh? I'd heard he didn't quite mesh...
no subject
Xerxes' weakness is hubris, not vanity. There's a difference.
The Foxy Cleopatra cameo was nice, but I would say that...