![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Bootable vs Portable
Feb. 1st, 2009 11:55 amYesterday's overtime was made bearable by building and tweaking a bootable Ubuntu Linux setup on my shiny new 8Gb USB stick. It was alternately straightforward and vexing: when I tried to be clever, it all went titsup; when I left it alone it was great - and I mean really great. Example: "full visual effects" was a sumptuous bouncy delight out of the box, but when I updated the graphics drivers, it died. Bah! I broke it three times, the last one downloading "all system updates" and choking the reserved disk space; even deleting the junk left me with a crufty interrupted mess.
The lesson here is that there's more than one way to skin a snuffleupagus: Ubuntu Live Peristent on a stick is not a full desktop install, kids, don't treat it like one - it's a demo CD with a memory. Portable Linux looks like a much better way of doing it, this time it's a 'proper' install, no reserved faux diskspace to run out of while your phonebook wiki is tapdancing next door in a 4-Gb empty ballroom.
Question is, is a bootable stick anything more than a geek toy? Most of my world is Windish - I'm only exposed to other stuff when I choose to be. Perhaps just a big ol' encrypted bucket and a stack of portable apps is the way forward instead.
The lesson here is that there's more than one way to skin a snuffleupagus: Ubuntu Live Peristent on a stick is not a full desktop install, kids, don't treat it like one - it's a demo CD with a memory. Portable Linux looks like a much better way of doing it, this time it's a 'proper' install, no reserved faux diskspace to run out of while your phonebook wiki is tapdancing next door in a 4-Gb empty ballroom.
Question is, is a bootable stick anything more than a geek toy? Most of my world is Windish - I'm only exposed to other stuff when I choose to be. Perhaps just a big ol' encrypted bucket and a stack of portable apps is the way forward instead.
