Just want to get this down before I forget; thinking about LEJOG compared to other adventure holidays, where the natural tendency is to go all-out at the start (Crossfit WOD for breakfast?) and only the hardcore (Nastia!) are still going by the end with the rest subsiding into beer and Wii Bowling.
LEJOG was quantitatively different because it had an un-blaggable endpoint. Even if, say, a tri-themed camp training camp were to have an actual proper race at the end, it's still blaggable. A sightseeing tour would be, too; by the end of it, bad weather would tick the tearoom box more than the clifftop one. But a point-to-point tour can't be blagged: you allow a degree of slack because it's not a route march, but the only way to get where you want to go is to keep on riding, every day, munching up that mandatory itinerary.
In fact, the itinerary becomes the Prime Directive. Do what you like to have fun along the way, but you have to make the miles. Pretty soon I learned that an early start was essential unless I wanted to finish very late; no lie-ins on this holiday! Shopping, pubs, bike parts, food all change their priority from "best choice" to "first acceptable choice" because there's just no time to mither around all day comparing the titanium to the carbon widget or looking for organic hand-rolled dolmades when there's a can of Sutherland chilli in the Spar. This sounds grim, but actually, it was kind of okay; in fact it was liberating: buy food, get wheel, find campsite. The option-paralysis that sometimes hits me ("this pub has better beer" "its a bit crowded" "how about this one" "dingy" "lets go back to the first one" "argh!") isn't allowed: it breaches the Prime Directive: Get the miles in.
I'm wondering whether it is applicable elsewhere, because I rather enjoyed it.
Mind you, I enjoy the slack adventure stuff too: there the Prime Directive is to have fun; the adventuring is the secondary objective, the vector for the fun to be had, and as such it is changeable (and since hanging out with a beer and a bad movie is fun too, easily changed).
LEJOG was quantitatively different because it had an un-blaggable endpoint. Even if, say, a tri-themed camp training camp were to have an actual proper race at the end, it's still blaggable. A sightseeing tour would be, too; by the end of it, bad weather would tick the tearoom box more than the clifftop one. But a point-to-point tour can't be blagged: you allow a degree of slack because it's not a route march, but the only way to get where you want to go is to keep on riding, every day, munching up that mandatory itinerary.
In fact, the itinerary becomes the Prime Directive. Do what you like to have fun along the way, but you have to make the miles. Pretty soon I learned that an early start was essential unless I wanted to finish very late; no lie-ins on this holiday! Shopping, pubs, bike parts, food all change their priority from "best choice" to "first acceptable choice" because there's just no time to mither around all day comparing the titanium to the carbon widget or looking for organic hand-rolled dolmades when there's a can of Sutherland chilli in the Spar. This sounds grim, but actually, it was kind of okay; in fact it was liberating: buy food, get wheel, find campsite. The option-paralysis that sometimes hits me ("this pub has better beer" "its a bit crowded" "how about this one" "dingy" "lets go back to the first one" "argh!") isn't allowed: it breaches the Prime Directive: Get the miles in.
I'm wondering whether it is applicable elsewhere, because I rather enjoyed it.
Mind you, I enjoy the slack adventure stuff too: there the Prime Directive is to have fun; the adventuring is the secondary objective, the vector for the fun to be had, and as such it is changeable (and since hanging out with a beer and a bad movie is fun too, easily changed).