You don't seem to understand what the argument is actually about. You seem to think it's about science or something.
The real argument is that the religion of science, subsection "climate change" think the world is ending. Well just like any other religion and their world ending, that's fine. You fellas can panic all you like.
But where it does get tricky is when any bunch of believers don't want to pay the bill for their beliefs. And expect everyone else to pay as well. I know that's pretty standard stuff though and pretty much every group of religious folks and believers feel the same about their own "end of the world". Whether it's building a Tower to reach Heaven, or everyone drinking the Cool Aid. It's not enough for them to foot their own bill.
The proof of this is striking. And rather undeniable. If those proposing this scenairo decide to pay for their own ark/whatever end of world avoidence criteria _and_ their cheque/credi was good then there wouldn't be an argument would there.......! If the believers were front with the cash to do the stuff they claim needs to be done, and to pay for the process changes _they_ _want_ - just like all the other customers and their wants and needs. Then the producers wouldn't _be_ arguing it would be "would you like that in gren or blue", "when shall we start the process for you". But nope, those broke people for some reason think others should pay for their theories.
Well that might be the religious beliefs of the climate changers. But the religious belief of the merchants and manufactures is (1) You want it then you pay for it, (2) I can provide it to you at your reasonable cost. This has been around for longer than "science" and is a well working model. Remember these guys will make and sell you anything (at your cost); you want cookies the shape of Michael Jacksons original nose, done; you want bumper stickers saying "God does it with Virgins", fine; you want a fine ark to fix the end of the world, did you have plans already or should we bring in a boat designer? As usual, the question is simply "Who pays?" and if you haven't realised that yet, theny it is a matter of brain damage.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-02-02 04:22 am (UTC)You don't seem to understand what the argument is actually about. You seem to think it's about science or something.
The real argument is that the religion of science, subsection "climate change" think the world is ending. Well just like any other religion and their world ending, that's fine. You fellas can panic all you like.
But where it does get tricky is when any bunch of believers don't want to pay the bill for their beliefs. And expect everyone else to pay as well.
I know that's pretty standard stuff though and pretty much every group of religious folks and believers feel the same about their own "end of the world". Whether it's building a Tower to reach Heaven, or everyone drinking the Cool Aid. It's not enough for them to foot their own bill.
The proof of this is striking. And rather undeniable. If those proposing this scenairo decide to pay for their own ark/whatever end of world avoidence criteria _and_ their cheque/credi was good then there wouldn't be an argument would there.......!
If the believers were front with the cash to do the stuff they claim needs to be done, and to pay for the process changes _they_ _want_ - just like all the other customers and their wants and needs. Then the producers wouldn't _be_ arguing it would be "would you like that in gren or blue", "when shall we start the process for you". But nope, those broke people for some reason think others should pay for their theories.
Well that might be the religious beliefs of the climate changers. But the religious belief of the merchants and manufactures is (1) You want it then you pay for it, (2) I can provide it to you at your reasonable cost. This has been around for longer than "science" and is a well working model. Remember these guys will make and sell you anything (at your cost); you want cookies the shape of Michael Jacksons original nose, done; you want bumper stickers saying "God does it with Virgins", fine; you want a fine ark to fix the end of the world, did you have plans already or should we bring in a boat designer?
As usual, the question is simply "Who pays?" and if you haven't realised that yet, theny it is a matter of brain damage.