That is what science is about, or are you renaming what you're doing as "science".
You of course realise just blankly throwing up a claim of "strawman" without identifying the falacy is a "Strawman" falacy. As it is not relevant to the discussion and although easily disproveable, it doesn't add anything to your point.
Which brings us to the cirrect application of the ad homein. As such silly strawman attempts, when you should know better, point to the likelihood that you are personally standing on shakey ground in your analysis of the topic, leading to a high probability of a similiar loose analysis of the original topic.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-02-05 06:01 pm (UTC)That is what science is about, or are you renaming what you're doing as "science".
You of course realise just blankly throwing up a claim of "strawman" without identifying the falacy is a "Strawman" falacy. As it is not relevant to the discussion and although easily disproveable, it doesn't add anything to your point.
Which brings us to the cirrect application of the ad homein. As such silly strawman attempts, when you should know better, point to the likelihood that you are personally standing on shakey ground in your analysis of the topic, leading to a high probability of a similiar loose analysis of the original topic.