And if a method came along that was more useful still - more predictive, able to integrate subjective and objective experience, say - I'd jump. Of course, so would the scientific community, which would mean you'd carry on saying that it was just the same old thing anyway.
I suspect you've got a dogmatic position that science is no different from religion. They're not even the same class of phenomenon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-02-06 08:06 am (UTC)And if a method came along that was more useful still - more predictive, able to integrate subjective and objective experience, say - I'd jump. Of course, so would the scientific community, which would mean you'd carry on saying that it was just the same old thing anyway.
I suspect you've got a dogmatic position that science is no different from religion. They're not even the same class of phenomenon.