Hikers: Walking Poles?
Aug. 6th, 2007 01:08 pmQuick question for the hikers 'n' climbers out there: what's the deal with walking poles? I generally take my Excellent Stick - a twisty ash jobbie with a brass knob on the end - when going hiking. It's profoundly non-optimal but I don't care. Are these telescopickal sprung ergonomic efforts significantly better?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-06 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-07 09:21 am (UTC)Those I know that use tham say it saves their knees a load of trouble.
Your ash stick should be fine for that. Resist the temptation to succumb to your techno-gadget-lust and take pride in your traditional solution.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-07 10:26 am (UTC)I'm sure your stick will do a similar job, but you might consider a second stick to balance you up, otherwise you might find yourself at the physios. At the very least you'll find yourself in the walking boot shop more often.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-07 12:19 pm (UTC)So I went and bought a Snow Peak ultralight stove instead. Well, a chap needs a nice fresh brew after all that strenuous effort, doesn't he?
no subject
Date: 2007-08-07 01:08 pm (UTC)ii. It has a very pointy tip that sticks into the ground a bit for added not-falling-off-hills.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-09 07:07 pm (UTC)Turned up with no walking pole. Everyone else had one, along with snazzy walking boots from day one. Felt a bit under prepared until the group leader turned up dressed, like me, in old running shoes and without a pole.
If you want or need it for balance, especially downhill, then fair enough. My knees are good so I get away without it. But there is never a need for two. That's just silly and was mostly practised in Nepal by the Japanese when walking on the flat