andygates: (Default)
[personal profile] andygates
Obama's world tour is going great guns: they took him seriously in the Middle East and in Berlin two hundred thousand people turned out pretty much to anoint his feet with oil.  Two hundred thousand for a candidate they can't even elect.  Seems that he's pitching this as the Next Leader Of The Free World Tour and the rest of us out here in the world, we pretty much like that. 

Let's face it after eight years of Captain Catastrophe, Barney the frakking Dinosaur would be an improvement but I'm not seeing simple relief here, I'm seeing desperate relief and a thread of actual, genuine, Kennedy-flavoured optimism.  Crikey.

I wonder how much impact this will have on his electability in the US (you know, where his voters are)? 

Date: 2008-07-28 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simoneck.livejournal.com
pass a law saying that no single organisation is allowed to control more than...20%?....of the media. Split it by print and/or TV. Or some such. And 50% has to be controlled by UK citizens.
I'm sure clever people could formulate something like that.

I'd just like to get away from the all or nothing part of voting a party in for 5 years. It just means we have 3 parties all competing for the middle ground, and that I can't even think of two big issues where they differ significantly to use as an example.
How about you are Pro EU and want tax cuts.
Or antiwar and want greater taxation. (note that this may be the current libdem stance, but I lose track of whether they want to raise or lower taxes).

Date: 2008-07-28 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gedhrel.livejournal.com
Considering how newscorp manages to avoid paying tax, setting up a few shell companies to bypass restrictions on media monopolies ought to be child's play.

(wrt lib dems: touche; they want to raise taxes - but not say so so blatantly)

Date: 2008-07-28 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com
PR.

Everyone knows it.

Date: 2008-07-29 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simoneck.livejournal.com
I'm less against PR than I used to be.
But you still get the having to vote for a person or party that only partly aligns with your wishes. You also don't have the direct representation. If you don't like how your personal represenative is doing, you can't vote them out.
It certainly increases the impact of minority parties, whether that be Greens or National Front.

Date: 2008-07-29 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com
But the only person that aligns with my interests is me. Every politician is way off about something, so it's always a compromise. Parties and voting blocs are a necessary reality.

Profile

andygates: (Default)
andygates

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 10:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios