Quick enviro-question
Feb. 15th, 2009 01:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Are there any climate models that show no climate chance with increased CO2? Only I'm tired of playing whac-a-mole with deniers, and before I say "there are no models that show it because it is in defiance of bloody physics!" I need to be sure of it.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-15 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-15 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-15 03:21 pm (UTC)You realise that, with or without anthro/non-anthro global warming, mankind is doomed.
WTF does he mean by "enhance health-promoting properties"? It sounds a bit like energised water to me.
I find it interesting that such a large propertion of them are American. Is that simply a reflection of population size? Or something else?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-15 09:55 pm (UTC)And yes, health-promoting properties are right there with spiral water.
There must be some evolutionary benefit to this kind of willful stupidity, but I haven't found it yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-16 12:12 pm (UTC)It's not the same as native intelligence, which is (to a large degree) a variable based around the energy budget we can afford to give to the brain. This is something else.
We're a pattern-matching species, and there's a pleasant little epiphany feeling that comes with finding patterns. I wonder if folks who persist in silly beliefs just have the slider for "ooh, nice pattern" pushed up higher than most?
Or whether they're just dicks. :)