Worst Case Scenario
Nov. 26th, 2009 12:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

The blue squiggly line is satellite observations. The grey cone is the range of IPCC predictions - in this case for sea level rise. The observations closely track the worst case scenario.
Oh. Shit.
The IPCC's worst cases are pretty damn 'worst'. They're things like a Greenland melt this century, so there's something for the kids to look forward to.
The false-flap around 'climategate'? It's trying to distract people from this.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-26 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-26 01:12 pm (UTC)As for corporations, Well Def Jeff has an interesting point:
"I believe that for the most part, the corporations involved have little choice under the law but to protect their profits by pursuing Manufactured Doubt campaigns, as long as they are legal. The law in all 50 U.S. states has a provision similar to Maine's section 716, "The directors and officers of a corporation shall exercise their powers and discharge their duties with a view to the interest of the corporation and of the shareholders". There is no clause at the end that adds, "...but not at the expense of the environment, human rights, the public safety, the communities in which the corporation operates, or the dignity of employees". The law makes a company's board of directors legally liable for "breach of fiduciary responsibility" if they knowingly manage a company in a way that reduces profits. Shareholders can and have sued companies for being overly socially responsible, and not paying enough attention to the bottom line. "
no subject
Date: 2009-11-26 01:02 pm (UTC)It does feel rather Oh shit though. :(
no subject
Date: 2009-11-26 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-26 05:40 pm (UTC)