andygates: (Default)
[personal profile] andygates
Against my better judgment, I was so tempted by Norse Code and Boneshaker (sci-fi vikings in Rangarok LA, and gold-rush steampunk zombies respectively) that I bought some DRM'd ebooks from the lovely BooksOnBoard.com.  You can tell this won't end well, can't you?

The executive summary: Buy books, download books, move books to reader. Book-managey software says it needs an update: comply. Books no longer work, managey-software no longer sees reader, books on reader say "no".  Sundry reinstalls and re-registration does nothing.

Gamma flash, rampage!


From a customer viewpoint, I just spent good book money on broken things.  I have been ripped off.  I am angry.

If I'd downloaded skeezy ripoffs from Bittorrent, I would have got working books.  It's like the publishers are giving their products to an idiot child and asking me to trust that they'll get here and not get used for toilet paper.  Ignoring the insult implicit in publisher's use of DRM ("We think you're a thief, just shut up and pay us"), this is an enormous amount of trust.  It's the publisher and the retailer that get my anger because it is them with whom I have dealings.  Adobe's just some crap I need to makey worky.

As it happens, Adobe Digital Editions - the sinner in this little play - has junk key management and there have been DRM-cracking scripts available for months.  A bit of nerdy hoop jumping and lo, I have un-DRM'd versions of both books, and that is good. 

So please, Random House, Barnes & Noble, ditch the DRM, it hurts paying customers.  BooksOnBoard, and the rest of the industry, put some pressure up the pipe to get rid of the DRM, because I'm not buying any more when I have to go through all this frakkin' hassle.

Date: 2010-02-06 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thudthwacker.livejournal.com
My Holy Name is Aloysius Thudthwacker, and I approve this comment.

Date: 2010-02-06 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com
Aren't you a little short for a pope?

Re: And the cyberectoplasmic exoskeleton

Date: 2010-02-06 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andygates.livejournal.com
He's pursuing a radical scorched hat policy.

Date: 2010-02-18 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carldem.livejournal.com
DRM is to information technology what 8inch floppy disks are to a USB port.

DRM has to be designed with hard-to-transfer niggly do-not-change principles in mind. All the technology they run on is designed for consumer use and flexibility (ie convenience) or at least should be designed for that principle.
Every change in the support technology (new devices, upgraded software, added features) is a Critical Hit against the DRM's stability - and that stability is designed against flexibility (to stop circumvention) so is fundamentally hard to upgrade or give legacy support. For these reasons DRM, even if it appears to work now, is a fat fail!

Profile

andygates: (Default)
andygates

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 08:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios