Weight training for triathlon
Feb. 21st, 2007 11:02 am My gut feeling has been that I'm missing something by not doing any weights, but I'd discarded it as I really like weights, and I thought I was just jonesing for some clanky goodness. However, last night I caught a bunch of studies cited on the Tritalk podcast, which clearly suggested that certain groups of athletes can benefit from a weekly strength session and nobody suffers. The "you put on heavy useless muscle" idea is, it seems, a myth. Instead you get a boosted lactate threshold, and the benefit is greatest in novice and masters athletes and women (novices getting the lactate threshold benefit; masters getting reduced muscle loss over time; and women traditionally being less strength-conditioned as most gurls don't lift).
What works best, it seems, is explosive and compound action at about 70% of 1RM (one rep max: the biggest weight you can lift once only). So we're not talking about grinding out a billion reps with teeny dumbbells, but still a bit lighter than the standard 8-10 rep bodybuilder set. No room for super-slow or negative sets here, either. It's important not to cripple yourself for four days with a monster weights set when those four days could contain half a dozen other training sessions!
So here's the plan, once a week, using the low-tech gear I already have (a barbell, dumbbells, some sandbags to catch falling bars and a Swiss ball):
What works best, it seems, is explosive and compound action at about 70% of 1RM (one rep max: the biggest weight you can lift once only). So we're not talking about grinding out a billion reps with teeny dumbbells, but still a bit lighter than the standard 8-10 rep bodybuilder set. No room for super-slow or negative sets here, either. It's important not to cripple yourself for four days with a monster weights set when those four days could contain half a dozen other training sessions!
So here's the plan, once a week, using the low-tech gear I already have (a barbell, dumbbells, some sandbags to catch falling bars and a Swiss ball):
- Clean & jerk - good old olympic-style explosivity, good for posterior chain, legs, leg "jump", and sundry lats, shoulder, tricep and core goodness. 40-60kg on the bar, working to sets of about a dozen.
- Stiff-legged deadlift - lower back and hamstrings plus sundry grip goodness. 40-80kg probably, sets of a dozen.
- Bent-over barbell row - upper back and biceps, nice and fast, no idea what weights to use yet. Around 30kg, probably.
- Weighted swiss-ball crunch - abs and sundry core. This one is
ehutch's fault. Extended arms with a dumbbell, swing it over as you crunch. Four sets to failure or until I fall off the ball sideways weeping.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-21 02:15 pm (UTC)Alas I don't have the gear for a pulldown... it's rather the obvious swimmer's lift. But circumstances dictate, etc etc - and anyway my lats are so kitten-weak that mere water is ample resistance!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-23 08:39 pm (UTC)You could always train doing pull-ups. My lats are weak points, too, so I train mainly for strength -- 3x3, as explosively as possible, trying to make sure I go all the way down and all the way up. When you can hit all target reps, tie 5 pounds around your waist (a long belt or piece of rope will work fine for this purpose). It's low-tech but effective. And, once you're doing 3x3 with 15 or 20 pounds, you could probably do unweighted pull ups with body weight in the 6-8 rep range, if that's the number of reps you'd rather be training for tri-prep purposes.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-24 08:15 pm (UTC)